YES!
Some people feel that their voice is so small it won't be heard so why
bother. This is wrong! We all need to FIGHT BACK to keep our public lands open.We ALL must
get involved. Since so few people actually take the time and effort to write and call,
those who do are indeed heard. The extreme environmental groups know this and are
constantly pushing their members to write and call. While they make up only a small
percentage of people, they portray themselves as "the citizens". We need to do
exactly the same if we are to stop them from influencing the government to shut down
access to larger and larger areas of the very best government lands!
DO'S
Write your own letter, make your own call. Personal calls and letters have much more
impact than petitions or form letters.
Use rational logic. Not emotion.
Make your letter short Generally make only one major point. Make that point in the first
sentence of the letter or phone call. Example, "Please do not support the Wilderness
bill because it excessively limits access to our public lands." In essence, you are
"voting" on an issue with your letter or call.
Let the addressee know your concerns, be specific.
Emphasize your recreation as something of value to you and others
Mention your love of the outdoors and the environment.
3 short letters have much more impact than 1 long involved letter
Add something personal/family. A photo of you and your family on a trail is very good.
Your family has been visiting this place for 20 years, and now
the road is closed.
Get others to write/call. Get your friends, parents, club members, etc to be involved.
Help them write letters. Show them what THEY are losing by road closures.
Ask for a response, and to be allowed to give future input on this important matter.
This establishes you as an interested party. Always ask to be put on their mailing list.
DON'T
Don't
be nasty, negative, angry, or personal. This immediately
sets up an adversarial situation, which is almost always bad and counter-productive. It is
human nature to respond positively to calls for help, but to negatively to demands for
almost anything. There will indeed be times when it becomes necessary to be adversarial
with a politician or bureaucrat. This should be a last resort - and never your first
communication with them.
Don't
tell the politician/bureaucrat you are their boss (taxpayer). They will only react
coldly, or negatively. However, it is proper to mention you are one of the politician's
voting constituents (if you are) since they generally pay more attention to people who can
keep them in office.
Don't
attack the environmental community, Endangered Species
Act, etc. It is proper to disagree with these groups or with the
interpretation/implementation of a law like the ESA, but do so for rational and logical
reasons.
TALKING POINTS
Access to our public lands is what everyone needs to use
and enjoy them. Without access, these lands may as well be in another country.
Roads are a valid access for the majority of citizens.
Without them, only the extremely capable hikers with lots of time can use/enjoy our public
lands.
The very young, the old, and the disabled are definitely being discriminated against
when their access by roads is taken away. Road-less equals access-less for the majority of
citizens. This is just as bad a form of discrimination as gender, religion, or ethnicity.
You are an environmentalist too! The
extreme-environmental groups like the Sierra Club, SUWA, UWC, Forest Guardians, Earth
First, etc, etc like to claim that they stand on the "higher moral ground".
Their cause is more noble than ours. They are "saving" the land,
while we are despoiling it as we drive over it. As you well know, this is simply not true.
We care about the land just as much as they do - but are open-minded enough to allow
access to all, not just an elitist group. You need to point this out to the
politicians/bureaucrats.
The self-proclaimed "citizens" groups do NOT in
fact represent the view of the majority of the citizens. The "Citizens'
Proposal" by SUWA for HR- 1500 really is the very selfish opinion of a
self-proclaimed, small, but very vocal, group. You are just as much a citizen as they are.
They don't represent your opinion.
OHV use is just as valid a form of recreation on our
public lands as hiking. Please use the term OHV, not ORV. We really don't want to go off
the roads. We DO subscribe strongly to the principle of "Tread Lightly".
You are in favor of Wilderness areas, but not the bloated
and excessive plans proposed by the Wilderness Activists.
Closing areas and roads is actually NON-management. The
charter of the BLM, Forest Service, and National Park Service is to manage our public
lands, not to lock us out from them.
Rangers and "planners" make many road closures
rather arbitrarily. This robs the citizens of any voice in the planning or implementation.
RS-2477 Rights of Way must be protected. The present
government administration and all the extreme environmental groups hate RS-2477. But it is
still a valid law, and is the key to maintaining access. Defend RS-2477 every chance you
get.
Include photos, GPS satellite data, old maps showing
roads, etc. Documentation is everything! Try writing an article for a magazine documenting
a particular road or trail. Help Counties with this data trying to defend their RS-2477
rights. SUWA is doing the opposite with their "Road-Kill" program.
INTERNET / WEBSITE INFORMATION ON LEGISLATORS
The following site will give you information on all senators and representatives to
write, phone, or in many cases e-mail them. It will help you find the names and
addresses of congressmen for your parents, out-of-town friends, etc. You can search by
state, zip code, etc.
